The Official Warren Adler Site The Official Warren Adler Site
Tales of Human Conflict and Desire


Home Page

Book Shelf
Articles
Book Chat
Events
Author Bio
Electronic Publishing

Sign up for the
Warren Adler
E-Sheet

Receive Mr. Adler's monthly e-mail newsletter about writing and the writing life.

Your Name:
E-Mail:

Warren Adler E-Sheet Archives

May 5, 2006
Exposed: A Packaged Princess of Chic Lit

The Warren Adler E-Sheet 53

In this issue:

   
Warren Adler Greetings From Publishing Central

We are happy to offer you another issue of the Warren Adler E-Sheet, which keeps you up to date on what is happening in the author's world.

   

Exposed: A Packaged Princess of Chic Lit

For all those who dream of spending their lives sustained by the creative act of writing fiction, of telling stories out of the mysterious threads of their imaginings, of pursuing a calling that rises from their deeply held gut instincts about their mission as living creatures, of garnering respect from those among us who quest for understanding and truth, who hunger to replicate the powerful literary impact of the enduring great writers of great books, the story of Kaavya Viswanathan, the 19-year-old alleged writer of  How Opal Mehta Got Kissed, Got Wild and Got a Life must induce nausea and disgust.

Poor Kaavya is a packaged princess of chic lit, created out of the writing factory of Alloy Entertainment, a so-called book packager who has found success at manufacturing formula books in collusion with respectable publishers whose fierce pursuit of the bottom line has found these books-by-committee folks a lucrative profit center.

I reserve my high dudgeon for the cynical fools of the media who, either deliberately or stupidly, promoted Kaavya, hailing her work as the emergence of a great new young literary talent.

She was heralded, by no less a traditional authority than The New York Times, as a second coming of youthful talent; a discovery to be welcomed and lionized. The Times anointed her at first, only to discover that her attention-grabbing ploy was a big fib.

Whether they knew this in advance is a truth up for grabs. They have tried to undo the canard by a savage, rearguard action designed to imply that they had been had. Every nuance of the aftermath, including excerpts from the blogosphere and additional accusations of plagiarism, is gleefully reported in an effort to erase the naïveté of anointing a literary fraud.

The Alloy people and little Kaavya got themselves caught in the ringer for plagiarizing, in forty different places, the words of another author – presumably a real one, Megan McCafferty, whose books have found some traction in the marketplace. To add more fuel to the fire, there is some evidence that Kaavya’s novel plagiarized in more subtle ways from yet another book Can You Keep a Secret? by Sophie Kinsella.

It is not my intention to denounce publishing profits, imaginative marketing ploys or the books-by-committee practices of book packagers, an enterprise that has been going on since time immemorial. As a boy, I couldn’t get enough of the packaged lad books like the Hardy Boys, Bomba the Jungle Boy, The Boy Allies and others, while the other gender reveled in the "written by committee" books that produced Nancy Drew, Rebecca of Sunnybrook Farm and many others.

I reserve my high dudgeon for the cynical fools of the media who, either deliberately or stupidly, promoted Kaavya, hailing her work as the emergence of a great new young literary talent. It makes my blood boil when I think of the legions of literary wannabes working their hearts out in isolation or taking creative writing courses in the nearly two hundred universities, some costing as much as one hundred thousand dollars for the full program, to suddenly be confronted with the real skinny on how so-called literary reputations are made out of thin air and bullshit.

And what of the dreamers who aspire to literary heights, alone and unsung, as they apply their minds and imaginations to write novels that they hope will bring them literary glory and the funds to sustain their passion?

Kaavya was tailor-made for the publicity hook, third world antecedents, nineteen and still in college – a chic lit natural. The Alloy guys found her, helped manufacture her book, talked the Little, Brown people into the perfect promotional device, got the naive media hooked on the premise of a new literary discovery, and voila, a star is born. Unfortunately their quality control broke down and they were waylaid by dumb plagiarism.

In today’s world of overblown hype and celebrity worship, calling this a fraud might be too strong an accusation from a legal point of view, although the publisher of the McCafferty books used their noodle to get Kaavya’s book trashed and removed from bookstore shelves. Of course, Little, Brown allegedly made the decision to deep six the book, a ploy to wipe some of the egg off their faces. But then, swift capitulation is expected from the French, who have recently taken over ownership of the once venerable Little, Brown. In this case, they made surrender almost credible.

To compound the dopiness, poor Kaavya got a second chance at the media trough – an opportunity to explain herself to the press and national media, offering lame excuses like having "internalized" the McCafferty books and portraying herself as a victim rather than the perpetrator of a very obvious conspiracy. In this case even "gotcha" gains respectability.

Of course, the Alloy people can only muster shock at the goings on, as if they weren’t part of the conspiracy, especially since they share the copyright with Kaavya and who knows how much of the royalty advance. Nobody is saying what happened to all that dough. My recommendation is that it should go to indigent and beleaguered writers through the good offices of the Authors’ Guild and Pen.

I don’t cry for poor Kaavya. She had her fifteen minutes of fame.

But I do cry for the legions of aspiring writers of the imagination who try their damnedest to carve out a career in novel writing, people of real talent, who unfortunately get nudged aside by the realities of the publishing business – entities now owned by conglomerates that must operate at the largesse of bean counters. Of course, even a rant like this, has become a cliché and will not make a particle of difference in the way the publishing industry works.

It’s nice to contemplate the possibilities of real talent rising randomly to challenge and excite the imagination.

As for the reader, what does it matter if they lap up these pre-packaged little formulaic entertainments? Like most packaged entertainment that inundates the popular culture, the behind-the-scenes tempest has little relevance. One might say that, at the very least, these products get young people to read, which is not a bad thing. Higher aspirations like offering insight, artistry and, perhaps, wisdom and greater understanding of the human condition, are not presently in vogue. Perhaps they never were, but it’s nice to contemplate the possibilities of real talent rising randomly to challenge and excite the imagination.

My argument is designed to perforate the gullibility of the poor innocents who actually believe the spoon fed hype they get from what used to be respected purveyors of information like The New York Times, who once upon a time really lived up to their slogan "All the News that’s Fit to Print."

Unfortunately the old, grey lady has succumbed to galloping senility. Now all the cosmetic changes and fluff fill its pages. Making a literary heroine out of poor Kaavya is, beside simply dishonest, shameful and insulting, especially to "real writers." But then, high dudgeon aside, the use of anonymous sources and lack of attribution is a first cousin to plagiarism and a practice very much alive and well in the Times’ canon.

Of course, the Times is not the only culprit, but they serve as the obvious example since it operates in the heart of the New York publishing world and now benefits from an advertising binge of full page color ads hawking books.  Other outlets have fallen into line and are now concentrating on the rebuttal strategy of righteous indignation, bloody sword in hand.

For we writers who really write our own books, we can take some satisfaction in seeing a literary fraud exposed. Unfortunately, the symptoms of our disgust linger as we briefly turn away from our creative isolation to confront the ugly underbelly of the publishing business.

E-Sheets 1 to 52

For your convenience, we now offer an online archive of Warren Adler E-Sheets. See the E-Sheet archives now.

Until next time, happy reading.

Warren Adler

If you like this E-Sheet, use the following form to subscribe for monthly distribution.

Your Name:
E-Mail:

Visit Warren Adler's homepage now!

Back to Top

 

Send This Page
to a Friend!
Your E-Mail
Your Name
E-Mail of Friend
A production of Stonehouse Press

© Stonehouse Press, All Rights Reserved
   powered by dynamics online